Matt's Bracket Challenge

Presented by: Perf-Turf Lawn Service      								WOMEN'S

2017 Women's Tournament

PROJECTED STANDINGS
As of 4/3/2017 at 11:59 PM (Final Results)

Place Name Last,First Possible
Points
Total
Points
Points Gauge Predicted
Champ
Pick
Pct.
Tie
Break
Final Picked
Champ
32 16 8 4 2
1 Patton, Matt 120 120
120
Connecticut 68% 158 20 12 7 3 1 NO
2 Graham, Randy 120 120
120
Connecticut 79% 159 27 13 7 2 1 NO
3 Shugart, Steve 118 118
118
Connecticut 71% 129 23 12 6 3 1 NO
4 Patton, Aaron 112 112
112
Connecticut 81% 120 29 13 6 2 1 NO
5 Martin, Scott 104 104
104
Connecticut 76% 135 28 11 7 2 0 NO
6 Jeffries,Chad 101 101
101
Connecticut 75% 142 25 13 7 2 0 NO
7 Matthews, Sarah 100 100
100
Notre Dame 76% 123 27 13 6 2 0 NO
8 Fisher, Kyleigh 100 100
100
Connecticut 78% 149 28 12 7 2 0 NO
9 Ranta, Ron 97 97
97
Connecticut 78% 118 28 13 7 1 0 NO
10 Nathan Porter 94 94
94
Connecticut 76% 120 29 12 5 2 0 NO
11 Geiselman, Steve 94 94
94
Connecticut 75% 116 28 11 6 2 0 NO
12 Giselbach, Shawn 94 94
94
Notre Dame 79% 110 31 12 5 2 0 NO
13 Driver, Trent 93 93
93
Connecticut 65% 144 20 13 6 2 0 NO
14 Gordon, Edmund 90 90
90
Connecticut 70% 134 23 13 6 2 0 NO
15 Lozoya Juan 90 90
90
Connecticut 70% 149 25 11 6 2 0 NO
16 Norris, Linda 87 87
87
Connecticut 73% 145 25 14 6 1 0 NO
17 Smith, Steve 87 87
87
Connecticut 68% 156 24 12 5 2 0 NO
18 Norris, Matt 86 86
86
Connecticut 68% 125 25 11 6 1 0 NO
19 Shugart, Cindy 84 84
84
Notre Dame 71% 120 27 11 6 1 0 NO
20 Baxtert, Tim 80 80
80
Connecticut 67% 134 22 13 6 1 0 NO
21 Davis, Andy 77 77
77
Notre Dame 65% 123 23 12 5 1 0 NO
22 Laub, B-rad 77 77
77
Quinnipiac 73% 64 30 12 4 0 0 NO
23 Graham, Tammy 76 76
76
Connecticut 57% 136 18 11 6 1 0 NO
24 Fisher sam 68 68
68
Connecticut 63% 159 25 11 3 1 0 NO
25 Graham, Laynie 67 67
67
Connecticut 52% 55 17 10 5 1 0 NO
26 Cassetty, Jen 64 64
64
Oklahoma 59% 135 25 9 3 0 0 NO


Page: 1 of 1:    [1]

Last Updated On: 4/3/2017 at 11:59 PM
 
Matt's Bracket Challenge
Copyright Matt Norris 2001-2013


This is not intended to be used as a gambling device. It is strictly for entertainment purposes only. The NCAA does not promote, endorse, or condone gambling or sports wagering of any kind.